IF: 0.587
Cite Score:
0.7
THOMSON REUTERS - SCOPUS

Comparative Assessment of Fetal Malnutrition by Anthropometry and CAN Score

AUTHORS

BSV Shivanagaraja 1 , Kamila Raghuveera 1 , Achappa Basavaprabhu 1 , Mahalingam Soundarya 1 , *

1 Department of Pediatrics, Kasturba Medical College,Manipal University, Mangalore, India

How to Cite: Shivanagaraja B, Raghuveera K, Basavaprabhu A, Soundarya M. Comparative Assessment of Fetal Malnutrition by Anthropometry and CAN Score , Iran J Pediatr. 2016 ; 22(1):70-76.

ARTICLE INFORMATION

Iranian Journal of Pediatrics: 22 (1); 70-76
Published Online: March 31, 2012
Article Type: Research Article
Received: May 12, 2011
Accepted: September 25, 2011

Crossmark

CHEKING

READ FULL TEXT
Abstract

Objectives: Fetal malnutrition (FM) implies soft tissue wasting at birth with significant postnatal consequences and morbidity, and is identified by clinical assessment (CAN score) and anthropometry. No previous studies have been done to study all these parameters and evolve a screening method. The aim of this study was identifying the incidence of FM using CAN score and compare the nutritional assessment with anthropometry and evolve a screening tool for rapid assessment of FM.
Methods: Prospective study in Government district maternity hospital. 300 term newborns were assessed by CAN score and anthropometry recorded. The newborns were classified as per weight for age. Ponderal index (PI), Body mass index (BMI) and midarm circumference/head circumference ratio (MAC/HC) calculated and compared to CAN Score for accuracy in identifying FM.
Findings: Incidence of FM was 24%. Newborns identified malnourished by PI, BMI, MAC/HC were evaluated by CAN score and significant number of them (31/78 in PI, 60/121 in BMI, 51/81 in MAC/HC) were found well nourished. Similarly those recognized as normal by PI, BMI, MAC/HC were malnourished by CAN score(25/222 in PI, 11/179 in BMI, 42/219 in MAC/HC) with statistical significance(0.0001). BMI had the highest sensitivity and 11 neonates with normal BMI had low CAN score ann 9 of them had normal PI also  making a combination of BMI and PI a good indicator of normal nutrition.
Conclusion: FM is best identified by CAN Score. BMI is the best screening tool for malnutrition and when coupled with PI will identify most normally nourished newborns.

 

Keywords

CAN Score Fetal Malnutrition Ponderal Index Body Mass Index

© 0, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.

Fulltext

References

  • 1.

    References are available in PDF.

  • COMMENTS

    LEAVE A COMMENT HERE: