Iranian Journal of Pediatrics

Published by: Shiraz University of Medical Sciences

A 5-Fr Externalized Nephroureteral Catheter as the Sole Protective Device for Pediatric Pyeloplasty: The Experiences of 142 Patients

Mansour Mollaeian 1 , Maryam Ghavami-Adel 1 , * , Farid Eskandari 1 and Arash Mollaeian 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 General physician, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Pediatrics: October 2016, 26 (5); e5633
  • Published Online: June 15, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 6, 2016
  • Revised: March 10, 2016
  • Accepted: March 31, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijp.5633

To Cite: Mollaeian M, Ghavami-Adel M, Eskandari F, Mollaeian A. A 5-Fr Externalized Nephroureteral Catheter as the Sole Protective Device for Pediatric Pyeloplasty: The Experiences of 142 Patients, Iran J Pediatr. 2016 ;26(5):e5633. doi: 10.5812/ijp.5633.

Abstract
Copyright: Copyright © 2016, Iranian Journal of Pediatrics. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
References
  • 1. Austin PF, Cain MP, Rink RC. Nephrostomy tube drainage with pyeloplasty: is it necessarily a bad choice? J Urol. 2000; 163(5): 1528-30[PubMed]
  • 2. Arda IS, Oguzkurt P, Sevmis S. Transanastomotic stents for dismembered pyeloplasty in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002; 18(2-3): 115-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Mandhani A, Goel S, Bhandari M. Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty? J Urol. 2004; 171(4): 1440-2[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Smith KE, Holmes N, Lieb JI, Mandell J, Baskin LS, Kogan BA, et al. Stented versus nonstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a modern series and review of the literature. J Urol. 2002; 168(3): 1127-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Farhat WA, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE, Pippi Salle JL. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties. J Urol. 2008; 180(4 Suppl): 1693-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Baniel J, Livne PM, Savir A, Gillon G, Servadio C. Dismembered pyeloplasty in children with and without stents. Eur Urol. 1996; 30(3): 400-2[PubMed]
  • 7. Carr MC. The Kelalis-King-Belman Textbook of Clinical Pediatric Urology. 2007; : 479-86
  • 8. Zaidi Z, Mouriquand PD. The use of a multipurpose stent in children. Br J Urol. 1997; 80(5): 802-5[PubMed]
  • 9. McMullin N, Khor T, King P. Internal ureteric stenting following pyeloplasty reduces length of hospital stay in children. Br J Urol. 1993; 72(3): 370-2[PubMed]
  • 10. Yucel S, Samuelson ML, Nguyen MT, Baker LA. Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2007; 177(2): 720-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Hussain S, Frank JD. Complications and length of hospital stay following stented and unstented paediatric pyeloplasties. Br J Urol. 1994; 73(1): 87-9[PubMed]
  • 12. Ahmed S, Crankson S. Non-intubated pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 1997; 12(5-6): 389-92[PubMed]
  • 13. Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YFH. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 2016; : 3057-75
  • 14. Garg RK, Menon P, Narasimha Rao KL, Arora S, Batra YK. Pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis: Issues of double J stent versus nephrostomy tube as drainage technique. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2015; 20(1): 32-6[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader