Iranian Journal of Pediatrics

Published by: Kowsar

A 5-Fr Externalized Nephroureteral Catheter as the Sole Protective Device for Pediatric Pyeloplasty: The Experiences of 142 Patients

Mansour Mollaeian 1 , Maryam Ghavami-Adel 1 , * , Farid Eskandari 1 and Arash Mollaeian 2
Authors Information
1 Department of Pediatric Surgery, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, IR Iran
2 General physician, Tehran, IR Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Pediatrics: October 2016, 26 (5); e5633
  • Published Online: June 15, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: February 6, 2016
  • Revised: March 10, 2016
  • Accepted: March 31, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijp.5633

To Cite: Mollaeian M, Ghavami-Adel M, Eskandari F, Mollaeian A. A 5-Fr Externalized Nephroureteral Catheter as the Sole Protective Device for Pediatric Pyeloplasty: The Experiences of 142 Patients, Iran J Pediatr. 2016 ; 26(5):e5633. doi: 10.5812/ijp.5633.

Copyright © 2016, Growth & Development Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License ( which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Materials and Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
  • 1. Austin PF, Cain MP, Rink RC. Nephrostomy tube drainage with pyeloplasty: is it necessarily a bad choice? J Urol. 2000; 163(5): 1528-30[PubMed]
  • 2. Arda IS, Oguzkurt P, Sevmis S. Transanastomotic stents for dismembered pyeloplasty in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 2002; 18(2-3): 115-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 3. Mandhani A, Goel S, Bhandari M. Is antegrade stenting superior to retrograde stenting in laparoscopic pyeloplasty? J Urol. 2004; 171(4): 1440-2[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Smith KE, Holmes N, Lieb JI, Mandell J, Baskin LS, Kogan BA, et al. Stented versus nonstented pediatric pyeloplasty: a modern series and review of the literature. J Urol. 2002; 168(3): 1127-30[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Braga LH, Lorenzo AJ, Farhat WA, Bagli DJ, Khoury AE, Pippi Salle JL. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties. J Urol. 2008; 180(4 Suppl): 1693-8[DOI][PubMed]
  • 6. Baniel J, Livne PM, Savir A, Gillon G, Servadio C. Dismembered pyeloplasty in children with and without stents. Eur Urol. 1996; 30(3): 400-2[PubMed]
  • 7. Carr MC. The Kelalis-King-Belman Textbook of Clinical Pediatric Urology. 2007; : 479-86
  • 8. Zaidi Z, Mouriquand PD. The use of a multipurpose stent in children. Br J Urol. 1997; 80(5): 802-5[PubMed]
  • 9. McMullin N, Khor T, King P. Internal ureteric stenting following pyeloplasty reduces length of hospital stay in children. Br J Urol. 1993; 72(3): 370-2[PubMed]
  • 10. Yucel S, Samuelson ML, Nguyen MT, Baker LA. Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty. J Urol. 2007; 177(2): 720-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 11. Hussain S, Frank JD. Complications and length of hospital stay following stented and unstented paediatric pyeloplasties. Br J Urol. 1994; 73(1): 87-9[PubMed]
  • 12. Ahmed S, Crankson S. Non-intubated pyeloplasty for pelviureteric junction obstruction in children. Pediatr Surg Int. 1997; 12(5-6): 389-92[PubMed]
  • 13. Olsen LH, Rawashdeh YFH. Campbell-Walsh Urology. 2016; : 3057-75
  • 14. Garg RK, Menon P, Narasimha Rao KL, Arora S, Batra YK. Pyeloplasty for hydronephrosis: Issues of double J stent versus nephrostomy tube as drainage technique. J Indian Assoc Pediatr Surg. 2015; 20(1): 32-6[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:



Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments