Iranian Journal of Pediatrics

Published by: Kowsar

Early Neonatal Outcome in Caesarean Section: A Developing Country Perspective

Bharat Choudhary 1 , * , Yachana Choudhary 2 , Abhijit P Pakhare 3 , Deonath Mahto 4 and Latha Chaturvedula 5
Authors Information
1 Department of Pediatrics, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, MP, India
2 Department of Community Medicine, Gandhi Medical College, Bhopal, MP, India
3 Department of Community and Family Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, MP, India
4 Department of Pediatrics, Lady Harding Medical College, New Delhi, India
5 Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research Puducherry, India
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Pediatrics: February 2017, 27 (1); e7948
  • Published Online: October 4, 2016
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: July 20, 2016
  • Revised: August 11, 2016
  • Accepted: September 15, 2016
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijp.7948

To Cite: Choudhary B, Choudhary Y, Pakhare A P, Mahto D, Chaturvedula L. et al. Early Neonatal Outcome in Caesarean Section: A Developing Country Perspective, Iran J Pediatr. 2017 ; 27(1):e7948. doi: 10.5812/ijp.7948.

Abstract
Copyright © 2016, Growth & Development Research Center. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Introduction
2. Methods
3. Results
4. Discussion
References
  • 1. Working Definitions. 2016;
  • 2. Dobson R. Caesarean section rate in England and Wales hits 21. BMJ. 2001; 323(7319): 951[PubMed]
  • 3. Vogel JP, Betran AP, Vindevoghel N, Souza JP, Torloni MR, Zhang J, et al. Use of the Robson classification to assess caesarean section trends in 21 countries: a secondary analysis of two WHO multicountry surveys. Lancet Glob Health. 2015; 3(5)-70[DOI][PubMed]
  • 4. Villar J, Carroli G, Zavaleta N, Donner A, Wojdyla D, Faundes A, et al. Maternal and neonatal individual risks and benefits associated with caesarean delivery: multicentre prospective study. BMJ. 2007; 335(7628): 1025[DOI][PubMed]
  • 5. Ballard JL, Khoury JC, Wedig K, Wang L, Eilers-Walsman BL, Lipp R. New Ballard Score, expanded to include extremely premature infants. J Pediatr. 1991; 119(3): 417-23[PubMed]
  • 6. Carter BS, Haverkamp AD, Merenstein GB. The definition of acute perinatal asphyxia. Clin Perinatol. 1993; 20(2): 287-304[PubMed]
  • 7. Appropriate technology for birth. Lancet. 1985; 2(8452): 436-7[PubMed]
  • 8. Liston FA, Allen VM, O'Connell CM, Jangaard KA. Neonatal outcomes with caesarean delivery at term. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2008; 93(3)-82[DOI][PubMed]
  • 9. Ye J, Betran AP, Guerrero Vela M, Souza JP, Zhang J. Searching for the optimal rate of medically necessary cesarean delivery. Birth. 2014; 41(3): 237-44[DOI][PubMed]
  • 10. Mehta A, Apers L, Verstraelen H, Temmerman M. Trends in caesarean section rates at a maternity hospital in Mumbai, India. J Health Popul Nutr. 2001; 19(4): 306-12[PubMed]
  • 11. Mukherjee SN. Rising CS rate. J Obstet Gynecol India . 2006; 56(4): 298-300
  • 12. Bhasin SK, Rajoura OP, Sharma AK, Metha M, Gupta N, Kumar S, et al. A high prevalence of caesarean section rate in East Delhi. Indian J Community Med. 2007; 32(3): 222[DOI]
  • 13. Glavind J, Kindberg SF, Uldbjerg N, Khalil M, Moller AM, Mortensen BB, et al. Elective caesarean section at 38 weeks versus 39 weeks: neonatal and maternal outcomes in a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2013; 120(9): 1123-32[DOI][PubMed]
  • 14. Lumbiganon P, Laopaiboon M, Gulmezoglu AM, Souza JP, Taneepanichskul S, Ruyan P, et al. Method of delivery and pregnancy outcomes in Asia: the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health 2007-08. Lancet. 2010; 375(9713): 490-9[DOI][PubMed]
  • 15. Daniel S, Viswanathan M, Simi BN, Nazeema A. Comparison of Fetal Outcomes of Emergency and Elective Caesarean Sections in a Teaching Hospital in Kerala. Academic Medical J India. 2014; 2(1): 32-6
  • 16. Berlit S, Welzel G, Tuschy B, Nickol J, Hornemann A, Sutterlin M, et al. Emergency caesarean section: risk factors for adverse neonatal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2013; 287(5): 901-5[DOI][PubMed]
  • 17. Shah A, Fawole B, M'Imunya J M, Amokrane F, Nafiou I, Wolomby JJ, et al. Cesarean delivery outcomes from the WHO global survey on maternal and perinatal health in Africa. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2009; 107(3): 191-7[DOI][PubMed]
Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments