Iranian Journal of Pediatrics

Published by: Kowsar
Crossmark
Uncorrected Proof scheduled for 29 (4)

Comparative Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength of Four Glass-Containing Materials with Primary Teeth Dentin

Atiyeh Feiz 1 , Narjes Amrollahi ORCID 2 , * and Fereshte Ziayi 3
Authors Information
1 Department of Operative Dentistry, Dental Materials Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
3 Dental Student Research Center, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran
Article information
  • Iranian Journal of Pediatrics: In Press (In Press); e88774
  • Published Online: July 7, 2019
  • Article Type: Research Article
  • Received: January 6, 2019
  • Revised: April 9, 2019
  • Accepted: April 26, 2019
  • DOI: 10.5812/ijp.88774

To Cite: Feiz A, Amrollahi N, Ziayi F. Comparative Evaluation of Microtensile Bond Strength of Four Glass-Containing Materials with Primary Teeth Dentin, Iran J Pediatr. Online ahead of Print ; In Press(In Press):e88774. doi: 10.5812/ijp.88774.

Abstract
Copyright © 2019, Author(s). This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits copy and redistribute the material just in noncommercial usages, provided the original work is properly cited.
1. Background
2. Objectives
3. Methods
4. Results
5. Discussion
Acknowledgements
Footnotes
References
  • 1. McDonald RE, Avery DR, Stookey GK, Chin JR, Kowolik JE. Dental caries in the child and adolescent. McDonald and Avery dentistry for the child and adolescent. 10th ed. Louis: Missouri: Elsevier Inc; 2016. p. 172-6. doi: 10.1016/b978-0-323-28745-6.06001-4.
  • 2. Manuja N, Pandit IK, Srivastava N, Gugnani N, Nagpal R. Comparative evaluation of shear bond strength of various esthetic restorative materials to dentin: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011;29(1):7-13. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.79913. [PubMed: 21521911].
  • 3. Ritter AV. Sturdevant's art & science of operative dentistry-e-book. 6th ed. St. Mosby: Elsevier Health Sciences; 2017. p. 71-8.
  • 4. Scotti N, Comba A, Gambino A, Paolino DS, Alovisi M, Pasqualini D, et al. Microleakage at enamel and dentin margins with a bulk fills flowable resin. Eur J Dent. 2014;8(1):1-8. doi: 10.4103/1305-7456.126230. [PubMed: 24966739]. [PubMed Central: PMC4054019].
  • 5. Armstrong S, Geraldeli S, Maia R, Raposo LH, Soares CJ, Yamagawa J. Adhesion to tooth structure: A critical review of "micro" bond strength test methods. Dent Mater. 2010;26(2):e50-62. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2009.11.155. [PubMed: 20045179].
  • 6. Pires CW, Soldera EB, Bonzanini LIL, Lenzi TL, Soares FZM, Montagner AF, et al. Is adhesive bond strength similar in primary and permanent teeth? A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Adhes Dent. 2018;20(2):87-97. doi: 10.3290/j.jad.a40296. [PubMed: 29675511].
  • 7. Chau NP, Pandit S, Cai JN, Lee MH, Jeon JG. Relationship between fluoride release rate and anti-cariogenic biofilm activity of glass ionomer cements. Dent Mater. 2015;31(4):e100-8. doi: 10.1016/j.dental.2014.12.016. [PubMed: 25600801].
  • 8. Rekha CV, Varma B; Jayanthi. Comparative evaluation of tensile bond strength and microleakage of conventional glass ionomer cement, resin modified glass ionomer cement and compomer: An in vitro study. Contemp Clin Dent. 2012;3(3):282-7. doi: 10.4103/0976-237X.103619. [PubMed: 23293482]. [PubMed Central: PMC3532789].
  • 9. Melody FM, U-Jin YA, Natalie TW, Elizabeth TW, Chien JY. Effects of thermal fatigue on shear punch strength of tooth-colored restoratives. J Conserv Dent. 2016;19(4):338-42. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.186444. [PubMed: 27563182]. [PubMed Central: PMC4979280].
  • 10. Jyothi K, Annapurna S, Kumar AS, Venugopal P, Jayashankara C. Clinical evaluation of giomer- and resin-modified glass ionomer cement in class V noncarious cervical lesions: An in vivo study. J Conserv Dent. 2011;14(4):409-13. doi: 10.4103/0972-0707.87214. [PubMed: 22144814]. [PubMed Central: PMC3227292].
  • 11. Walia R, Jasuja P, Verma KG, Juneja S, Mathur A, Ahuja L. A comparative evaluation of microleakage and compressive strength of Ketac Molar, Giomer, Zirconomer, and Ceram-x: An in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2016;34(3):280-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.186746. [PubMed: 27461814].
  • 12. Asharaf S, Karthigeyan AS, Deivanai M, Mani R. Zirconia: Properthies and application" A review. Pakistan Oral Dentl J. 2014;34(1):178.
  • 13. Chalissery VP, Marwah N, Almuhaiza M, AlZailai AM, Chalisserry EP, Bhandi SH, et al. Study of the mechanical properties of the Novel Zirconia-reinforced glass lonomer cement. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2016;17(5):394-8. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10024-1861. [PubMed: 27443366].
  • 14. Vermeersch G, Leloup G, Delmee M, Vreven J. Antibacterial activity of glass-ionomer cements, compomers and resin composites: Relationship between acidity and material setting phase. J Oral Rehabil. 2005;32(5):368-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2004.01300.x. [PubMed: 15842247].
  • 15. Prabhakar AR, Raj S, Raju OS. Comparison of shear bond strength of composite, compomer and resin modified glass ionomer in primary and permanent teeth: an in vitro study. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2003;21(3):86-94. [PubMed: 14703213].
  • 16. Bahrololoomi Z, Dastjerdi F, Mirhadi S. [Comparison of shear bond strength of compoglass and glass ionomer to the dentin of primary molars]. J Dent. 2009;9(4):326-31. Persian.
  • 17. Almuammar MF, Schulman A, Salama FS. Shear bond strength of six restorative materials. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2001;25(3):221-5. doi: 10.17796/jcpd.25.3.r8g48vn51l46421m. [PubMed: 12049082].
  • 18. Eldesouky HI, Hanno AG, Bakry NS, Ahmed DM. Marginal lealage evaluation of giomer and compomer in primarey teeth (in-vitro study). Alexandria Dent J. 2016;41(2):188-93.
  • 19. Yadav G, Rehani U, Rana V. A comparative evaluation of marginal leakage of different restorative materials in deciduous molars: An in vitro study. Int J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2012;5(2):101-7. doi: 10.5005/jp-journals-10005-1145. [PubMed: 25206147]. [PubMed Central: PMC4148735].
  • 20. Quader SA, Alam MS, Bashar A, Gafur A, Al Mansur M. Compressive strength, fluoride release and recharge of giomer. Update Dent College J. 2012;2(2):28-37. doi: 10.3329/updcj.v2i2.15533.

Featured Image:

Creative Commons License Except where otherwise noted, this work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial 4.0 International License .

Search Relations:

Author(s):

Article(s):

Create Citiation Alert
via Google Reader

Readers' Comments